query cost
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Mountain View (0.04)
- North America > United States > Utah > Salt Lake County > Salt Lake City (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- South America > Paraguay > Asunción > Asunción (0.04)
- Energy (1.00)
- Education (0.68)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Infections and Infectious Diseases (0.48)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.30)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.88)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.34)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Arizona > Pima County > Tucson (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York > Tompkins County > Ithaca (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
Monitoring State Transitions in Markovian Systems with Sampling Cost
Saurav, Kumar, Shroff, Ness B., Liang, Yingbin
We consider a node-monitor pair, where the node's state varies with time. The monitor needs to track the node's state at all times; however, there is a fixed cost for each state query. So the monitor may instead predict the state using time-series forecasting methods, including time-series foundation models (TSFMs), and query only when prediction uncertainty is high. Since query decisions influence prediction accuracy, determining when to query is nontrivial. A natural approach is a greedy policy that predicts when the expected prediction loss is below the query cost and queries otherwise. We analyze this policy in a Markovian setting, where the optimal (OPT) strategy is a state-dependent threshold policy minimizing the time-averaged sum of query cost and prediction losses. We show that, in general, the greedy policy is suboptimal and can have an unbounded competitive ratio, but under common conditions such as identically distributed transition probabilities, it performs close to OPT. For the case of unknown transition probabilities, we further propose a projected stochastic gradient descent (PSGD)-based learning variant of the greedy policy, which achieves a favorable predict-query tradeoff with improved computational efficiency compared to OPT.
- North America > United States > Ohio > Franklin County > Columbus (0.04)
- Asia > India (0.04)